Legal Opinion
(PC) Bolds v. Luevanos
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 7, 2024No. 1:21-cv-01668Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JON-ERIK ROOSEVELT BOLDS, JR., No. 1:21-cv-01668-NODJ-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF 13 v. COUNSEL, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 LUEVANOS, et al.,, (ECF No. 77) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion for appointment of counsel, filed 20 February 6, 2024. Plaintiff seeks appointment of counsel due indigency,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Wayne Acton and Judy Acton, Guardians Ad Litem for James Acton v. Vernonia School District 47jCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994