Legal Opinion
Cinaglia v. Levin
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 11, 2003No. Civil Action 02-1308(JEI)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment pur suant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on Plaintiffs claims alleging violation of his constitutional rights under the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Plaintiff opposes summary judgment and requests, in the alternative, leave to file an amended complaint asserting a claim based on the Impairment of Contracts Clause, Art. I, § 10, of the United States Constitution. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Montanye v. Wissahickon School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Hailey v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Cataldo v. MosesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004