Hailey v. City of Camden
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge:
I. INTRODUCTION
The present litigation has a long and tortured history. Instituted in 2001, this case has already endured a three week- long trial tried by consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) before the Magistrate Judge, a jury verdict in favor of both Plaintiffs, and post-verdict motions practice. Nonetheless, trial errors and unresolved questions have, thus far, prevented its resolution. With this Opinion, the Court intends to set out a clear path on which this action will proceed, with all due haste, to a final judgment.
The procedural posture of this case…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Garcetti v. CeballosSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- M.S. ex rel. Hall v. Susquehanna Township School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Hailey v. City of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Wright v. City of Salisbury, Mo.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2009
- Chambers v. York County PrisonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Chambers v. York County PrisonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.