Legal Opinion

Lano v. Osberg Construction Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1965No. 38006PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.

— This is an action for damages for wrongful termination of a subcontract to clear and grub a state highway right-of-way in Pacific County.

In November, 1958, defendant (respondent) Osberg Construction Company, as prime contractor, executed a contract with the state of Washington to construct a portion of the Tokeland-Raymond highway.

Plaintiffs (appellants) executed a subcontract with defendant covering the clearing and grubbing portion of the prime contract. The plaintiffs, who were primarily loggers, contracted with a third party to perform the clearing and grubbing after the removal of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kane v. KlosWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Vance v. Mutual Gold Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dravo Corp. v. L. W. Moses Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  2. Cascade Auto Glass v. PROGRESSIVE CAS. INS.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. Cascade Auto Glass, Inc. v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Associated Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Northwest Cascade, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Sak & Associates, / Cross- Res. v. Ferguson Construction, / Cross-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API