Vance v. Mutual Gold Corp.

This appeal involved two actions brought against defendant, Mutual Gold Corporation.

In the first case, J. A. Vance, the Vance Lumber Company, W. G. Peebles, and Louise Woodward sought to recover judgment against defendant by reason of certain written agreements called production notes, issued by defendant to plaintiffs, aggregating sixteen thousand dollars. The complaint alleges that, during August, 1936, defendant borrowed from plaintiffs, giving its notes as evidence of the indebtedness, the following sums: J. A. Vance, eight thousand dollars; Vance Lumber Company, six thousand dollars; W.…