Legal Opinion
Lombardo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 27, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-0793PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
This is an automobile insurance case in which defendant has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). Plaintiff has responded. Following an order for additional briefing, defendant filed a second motion to dismiss, to which plaintiff responded, but defendant was vague about the procedural grounds for this second motion. For the reasons given below, I will treat the second motion as part of the first, and treat both motions as a 12(b)(6) motion. I will dismiss the complaint without prejudice and with leave to amend in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Rocks v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Lester Slotnick v. Paul GarfinkleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Frowen v. BlankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Dercoli v. Pennsylvania National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Pekular v. EichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Romano v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Rottmund v. Continental Assurance Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- March v. Paradise Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Brown v. CandeloraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Mark Hofkin v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.