Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Bausman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1917No. 13696PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered April 13, 1916, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for separate maintenance.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against her husband for. separate maintenance. She joined as defendants Frederick Bausman, Daniel Kelleher, the Seattle National Bank, the Maine Improvement Company, and Lewis C. Palmer, alleging that the defendants held property belonging to the defendant Kelley or were indebted to him. She applied for, and was granted, an injunction restraining the several defendants from in any way disposing of, or interfering with, certain property alleged to be in their possession, and from paying any money over to Kelley. Defendant Kel*688ley is a nonresident of the state. He…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Pennington v. Fourth National Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Thurston v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  5. Bragg v. GaynorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Artman v. ArtmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. George v. GeorgeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  3. Union Indemnity Co. v. A. D. Drumm, Jr., Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API