Legal Opinion
Anchor Savings Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 10, 2004No. 95-39 CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*7 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
BLOCK, Judge.
On September 29, 2003, this court entered an opinion and order granting-in-part and denying-in-part defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s various damages claims. See Anchor Sav. Bank, FSB v. United States, 59 Fed.Cl. 126 (2003). Specifically, this court partially granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment as to plaintiffs claim for reliance damages. The court concluded, in essence, that plaintiffs claim— based on its assumption of net liabilities in its supervisory mergers — was akin to a claim for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Lasalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- CW Government Travel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Englewood Terrace Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010