Legal Opinion

Felts v. Liberty Emergency Service, P.A.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 20, 1990No. 8917SC204PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

The sole question presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred in directing verdict for defendants at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence.

The purpose of a motion for directed verdict under N.C. Gen. Stat. sec. 1A-1, Rule 50(a) is to test the legal sufficiency of the evidence to take the case to the jury. Wallace v. Evans, 60 N.C. App. 145, 298 S.E.2d 193 (1982). In determining such a motion, plaintiffs “should be given the benefit of all reasonable inferences; and that the motion should be denied if there is any evidence more than a scintilla to support plaintiff’s prima…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Turner v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Lockwood v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Lowery v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Boyd v. DrumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Ridenhour v. International Business MacHines Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Chappell v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Leatherwood v. EhlingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Kerr v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API