Legal Opinion

City of Aberdeen v. Regan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 2010No. 82476-2PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

¶1 Francis James Regan challenges the revocation of the suspension of his sentence after he was accused, but found not guilty, of fourth degree assault and criminal trespass. Regan’s probation was conditioned on having “[n]o criminal violations of law or alcohol related infractions.” Clerk’s Papers (CP) at 62. He argues that “criminal violations of law” requires a conviction or proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he committed a crime. He asserts that because he was found not guilty of the crimes at trial, the court should have been collaterally estopped from finding he violated his probation…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Shoemaker v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Standlee v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. KuhnWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. In Re BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. McCuistionWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re the Guardianship of LambWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Schatz v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. State v. LeonardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State of Washington v. M.N.H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API