Legal Opinion

United States v. Kilbourne

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 13, 1990No. ACM 28024PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge,

The knotty crime of conspiracy — and what admissible matter is sufficient to prove it — is before us today. We find that *733the trial judge erred by treating an offer of proof as evidence over defense objection. The offer of proof came from Captain W, a defense lawyer at an earlier court-martial; it purported to reveal the appellant’s conspiratorial statements.

Airman Basic Kilbourne, the appellant, was convicted by a general court-martial with members of wrongful use and distribution of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and conspiracy to commit the offense of perjury,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. BufalinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  2. United States v. DoctorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  3. United States v. PerlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. United States v. Messerlian, Harry H., in 85-5323. United States of America v. Wolkowski, Henry F., in 86-5345Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. KauffmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. MobleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. SmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. FrazierU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API