United States v. Kilbourne
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
KASTL, Senior Judge,
The knotty crime of conspiracy — and what admissible matter is sufficient to prove it — is before us today. We find that *733the trial judge erred by treating an offer of proof as evidence over defense objection. The offer of proof came from Captain W, a defense lawyer at an earlier court-martial; it purported to reveal the appellant’s conspiratorial statements.
Airman Basic Kilbourne, the appellant, was convicted by a general court-martial with members of wrongful use and distribution of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and conspiracy to commit the offense of perjury,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. BufalinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- United States v. DoctorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. PerlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- United States v. Messerlian, Harry H., in 85-5323. United States of America v. Wolkowski, Henry F., in 86-5345Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- United States v. KauffmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. MobleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. SmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. FrazierU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991