Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 21, 1993No. ACMR 9101552PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*774OPINION OF THE COURT

DELLÓRTO, Judge:

Contrary to Ms pleas, the appellant was found guilty by a general court-martial consisting of officer and enlisted members of desertion and assault with intent to commit rape, in violation of Articles 85 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 885 and 934 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ], The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for four years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El.

The appellant attacks the jurisdiction of his court-martial on three bases: the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Grafton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. United States v. WeissUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  5. United States v. McClainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BertieCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. United States v. BertieCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  3. United States v. RiesbeckCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
  4. United States v. RiesbeckCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API