Legal Opinion

Ladd v. Kuhn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1900No. 19,203PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Erom the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellees instituted this action against Boyd Ladd for the partition of forty acres of land. The facts pertinent to the question involved, on the motion to dismiss this appeal, appear to be as follows: In October, 1890, William Eriermood, by his warranty deed, conveyed the land in question to William A. Eriermood. In September, 1891, the latter, by a warranty deed, conveyed it to George W. Parsons. Parsons, in November, -1894, by his warranty deed, conveyed the premises to Boyd Ladd, the nominal appellant herein. The record further discloses that, after the commencement of this action by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bever v. NorthIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Martin v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
  3. Nye v. LowryIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. McClure v. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Eaton v. LymanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Indiana State Board of Dental Examinees v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. American Surety Co. v. BallmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1900
  3. Campbell-Smith-Ritchie Co. v. SoudersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. HenryMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  5. United States Fidelity Co. v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API