Legal Opinion

American Surety Co. v. Ballman

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Decided November 8, 1900No. 4,272PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action at Law on Bond of Indemnity.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, District Judge.

On August 5, 1895, a firm known as Tromanhauser Bros, entered into a contract with the Burlington Elevator Company to construct its elevator. Pursuant to the requirements of that contract, the American Surety Company, the plaintiff in this action, executed and delivered its bond in the penal sum of $50,000 to the elevator company, to secure the faithful performance of that contract. On or about the same day the defendants, Henry W. Ballman and Joseph Durfee, executed and delivered their bond to the American Surety Company to indemnify it against loss and damage by reason…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Strong v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. Southern Railway News Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. City of St. Joseph v. Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Garrison v. Babbage Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Pennsylvania Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Phoenix National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Standard Surety & Casualty Co. of New York v. Standard Acc. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
  4. Wilson v. Hite'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Hooker v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API