Legal Opinion
Raymond v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 5, 2002No. 01 C 0212PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Currently before the court is defendant City of Chicago’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (“Rule 56”). For the following reasons, the court grants defendant’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Plaintiff Alberta Raymond (“Raymond”) brings this suit, claiming that defendant City of Chicago (“the City”) retaliated against her, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Particularly, Raymond claims that the City committed the following retaliatory acts against…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Loretta Cheek v. Western and Southern Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Indira ADUSUMILLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Smith v. SevernCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Krause v. Turnberry Country ClubDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Johnson v. Phoenix Exteriors Inc..District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
- Kathleen Lorentzen v. Gateway Regional YMCADistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2026
- Tapia v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019