Legal Opinion
Oregon Natural Resources Council v. Marsh
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 24, 1987No. 86-3670PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
FERGUSON, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs, the Oregon Natural Resources Council, Oregon Guides and Packers Association, Rogue Flyfishers, Inc., and Rogue River Guides Association (“Resources Council”), appeal the denial of an injunction to stop construction by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”) of a dam on Elk Creek in Southern Oregon. The Resources Council contends that the Corps’ final supplemental environmental impact statement (“EIS”) for the dam project fails to comply with the National *1492Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Pub.L. No. 91-190, 83 Stat. 853 (1970)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- California v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Warm Springs Dam Task Force v. Lieutenant General William C. Gribble, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Oregon Environmental Council v. KunzmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Sierra Club v. PenfoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Harriet F. Laflamme v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Joseph Keating , Respondent-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Sierra Club v. PenfoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Resources Limited, Inc. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.