Legal Opinion
Toyo Tire Corporation v. Atturo Tire Corporation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 2, 2020No. 1:14-cv-00206Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TOYO TIRE & RUBBER CO., LTD, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 14 C 00206 v. Judge Mary Rowland ATTURO TIRE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Plaintiffs Toyo Tire & Rubber Co., Ltd. and Toyo Tire U.S.A Corp. (collec- tively, “Toyo”), brought this action against Defendants Atturo Tire Corporation (“At- turo”) and Svizz-One Corporation, Ltd., alleging in part that Atturo had infringed the trade dress on Toyo’s Open Country Mountain Tires (“OPMT”). On July 23, 2018, the Court granted Atturo’s motion for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- William McNabola v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Kenneth Spegon v. The Catholic Bishop of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Jennifer Farfaras v. Citizens Bank and Trust of Chicago, a Corporation, Robert Michael, George Michael, and Nicholas TanglisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.