Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Darlington Veneer Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 29, 1946No. 15833PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Baker

delivered the unanimous Opinion of the Court.

Darlington Veneer Company, a corporation, owns and operates a veneer plant at Darlington, South Carolina. In order to assure a supply of the necessary logs, blocks or timber to operate its plant, it had purchased certain of the timber from various tracts of land. In accord with its custom, Dar-lington Veneer Company contracted with one W. R. Smith to cut and haul this timber to its plant. Smith owned his own logging equipment, hired and paid his own employees, who worked solely under his directions, and was paid at so much per thousand feet for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marchbanks v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Jolly v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  3. Kennerly v. Ocmulgee Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  4. Patterson v. Courtenay Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. McDowell v. Stilley Plywood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  2. Adams v. Davison-Paxon Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. John G. MacMullen v. South Carolina Electric & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
  4. Miles v. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. Younginer v. J.A. Jones Const. Co. Et At.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API