Legal Opinion

Pollicino v. Roemer & Featherstonhaugh, P. C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 2, 1999PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Mikoll, J.

This appeal requires us to decide a question of first impression, namely, whether in a legal malpractice action a law firm’s continuous representation of a client should be imputed to a former associate for purposes of tolling the Statute of Limitations against the associate. On the particular facts presented herein, we hold that it should be and reverse the contrary determination of Supreme Court.

On April 11, 1989, plaintiff retained the law firm of defendant Roemer and Featherstonhaugh, P. C. (hereinafter the law firm) to represent him in connection with a July…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Glamm v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Siegel v. KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aaron v. Roemer, Wallens & Mineaux, L. L. P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Dischiavi v. CalliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. In re the Arbitration between Clark Patterson Engineers, Surveyor & Architects, P.C. & City of Gloversville Board of Water CommissionersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Protostorm, LLC v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, LLPDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  5. Moonlight Enters., LLC v. MrozSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API