Bishop v. Clark
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
54 P.3d 804 (2002)
George W. BISHOP, Appellant,
v.
Stacey A. CLARK, Appellee.
No. S-9232.
Supreme Court of Alaska.
September 13, 2002.
Claire Steffens, Law Offices of Claire Steffens, Anchorage, for Appellant.
Allan Beiswenger, Robinson & Beiswenger, Soldotna, for Appellee.
Before: FABE, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, BRYNER, and CARPENETI, Justices.
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Was it error to award Stacey A. Clark a one-half interest in certain property accumulated while she cohabited with George W. (Will) Bishop? Because we hold that it was error to conclude that a settlement…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Oaksmith v. BrusichAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Beal v. BealOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Willeke v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Carroll v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Zimin v. ZiminAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.