Legal Opinion
Puget Sound Nav. Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 30, 1939No. 9073PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
The case comes to us on an agreed statement of facts, which are relatively simple. The appellant operates several steamships on Puget Sound and adjacent waters — Admiralty Inlet, the Straits of Juan de Fuca, Rosario Strait, and Haro Strait. The cities and islands served by said vessels are Seattle, on the mainland, located on Puget Sound; Port Townsend, on the mainland, located on Admiralty Inlet; Port Angeles, on the mainland, located on the Straits of Juan de Fuca; Victoria, on Vancouver Island, located on the Straits of Juan de Fuca; Bellingham, on the mainland,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Port Richmond & Bergen Point Ferry Co. v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Canadian Pac. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- People v. San Francisco & Alameda R.R.California Supreme Court · 1868
- Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . N.J.S.N. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Mayor of New York v. New Jersey Steamboat Navigation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alaska Steamship Company, a Corporation v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Klebanow v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Blennerhassett Historical Park Commission v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1988
- Western Holding Group, Inc. v. Mayagüez Port CommissionDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009