Legal Opinion

Fitzgerald v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 19, 1931No. 2 Div. 984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, J;

No dissent was interposed by the widow or any one in her behalf (sections 10593-10596, Code, • 1923) to the will of R. H. Fitzgerald, who died in Blay, 1928. Exemptions allowed have been set aside without contest. Crownover v. Crownover, 216 Ala. 286, 113 So. 42. There were no children, and the widow seeks her distributive share of the estate, consisting of a few thousand dollars now in the hands of the executor. Her right thereto depends upon a proper construction of the will of her husband, which reads as follows:

“I, R. H. Fitzgerald, on this the 24th day of July 1917, do hereby…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. McRee's Adm'rs v. MeansSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  3. Blakeney v. DuboseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Crownover v. CrownoverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Ellis v. Ellis's AdministratorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mastin v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MOBILE, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  2. Howell v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API