Legal Opinion

Howell v. Ward

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 9, 1935No. 4 Div. 801PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The appeal is from a decree sustaining demurrers to the bill, and for the dissolution of an injunction.

Appellant, Maud Howell, is the executrix of the will of George M. Howell, the deceased husband, and a distributee and devisee thereunder with the respondents. After her qualification as executrix, she filed a bill in her representative capacity and as an individual for several purposes, namely, for the removal of the estate into equity for a settlement of the guardianship of her deceased testator with his ward, Myrtle Brock, one of the respondents (section 8207, Code), and to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. de Graffenried v. BreitlingSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Harris v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Childs v. JulianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  3. Vaughan v. VaughanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. King v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Archer v. TollesonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API