Crownover v. Crownover
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
Whatever the rule may be in other states, it is well settled by the decisions of this court that, while the failure of the widow to dissent from her husband’s will precludes her from claiming- dow: er or a distributive share in her husband’s estate, such failure does not cut off her right to the exemptions given her under the law when seasonably claimed. Hubbard v. Russell, 73 Ala. 578; Bell v. Bell, 84 Ala. 64, 4 So. 189; Chandler v. Chandler, 87 Ala. 303, 6 So. 153; Richter v. Richter, 180 Ala. 218, 60 So. 880. Therefore the widow in the instant case is entitled to the exemption claimed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richter v. RichterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Chandler v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Hubbard v. RussellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
3Cited by10 opinions
- Merchants' Nat. Bank of Mobile v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- American Life Ins. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Gray v. WeatherfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Dake v. InglisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Howell v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.