Legal Opinion
Rhem v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided December 5, 1991No. 01-91-01288-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
O’CONNOR, Justice.
Appellant, Ronnie Rhem, filed a motion for a remand under Tex.R.App.P. 53(m) and a motion to extend the time to file the statement of facts. The State did not file a response.
On July 22, 1991, appellant pled nolo contendere to possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver, and was sentenced to 25 years confinement and a $50,000 fine. On August 9, 1991, appellant asserts he made a timely request to the court reporter to prepare a statement of facts from the plea proceeding as required by Tex.R.App.P. 53(a). In his motion, appellant says the court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Biffle v. Morton Rubber Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Whitsitt v. RamsayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- State ex rel. Holmes v. KolendaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Washington, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
- Mims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Waller v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Christopher Holmes, s/k/a Christopher Sean Holmes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.