Legal Opinion

Biffle v. Morton Rubber Industries, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1990No. C-9470PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this case is whether a cost bond should be considered as timely filed when delivered to the clerk before the deadline for perfecting an appeal but where the clerk inadvertently failed to file-mark it until after the deadline. Morris Biffle appealed from a judgment rendered against him. On November 6, 1989, the last day for filing a cost bond for his appeal, Biffle both had the bond delivered to the county clerk and verified its receipt by telephone. The deputy clerk, by signed affidavit, affirms that the bond was timely received. Although the bond was filed with the clerk on that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Christy Jean Wand LaCokeTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Holman v. Chevaillier's Adm'rTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Hanover Fire Insurance v. Shrader & RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Beal's Adm'r v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Turner v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In Re Washington, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  2. Warner v. GlassTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Jamar v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Re Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
  5. Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API