Legal Opinion

Mims v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 24, 1992No. 05-91-01463-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAGARDE, Justice.

The Court has before it motions by both appellant and the State in the above-numbered causes. Appellant has filed motions for extension of time to file the record in each of the above-numbered causes in which he requests an extension of one year. As a reason for the extensions, appellant claims that the district clerk and trial court have denied his requests for both transcripts and statements of facts. In support of his motions, appellant has attached certificates signed by the trial judge stating that appellant entered a guilty plea in each case and that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Homan v. HughesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Lemmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Padgett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Soto v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  2. McConnell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2000
  3. Curlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API