Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nunamaker v. New Alexandria Bus Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 29, 1952No. Appeal, No. 121Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno:

I see no reason whatsoever for sending • this case back for another trial. • The only one who could possibly be hurt by an affirmance of a single verdict is the hus-.1 band, and he has indicated his willingness to assign his share of the verdict, whatever it may be, to his wife. A release can be drawn, with .the approval of the Court, which will forever save the defendants against any further possible claims as a result of this trespass action and will equally bar the plaintiffs from any further action in the entire matter.

Why saddle on to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Siidekum v. Animal Rescue League of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Lewis v. Hunlock's Creek & Muhlenburg Turnpike Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Lehigh Iron Co. v. RuppSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Fulcomer v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Taylor v. RoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API