Nunamaker v. New Alexandria Bus Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Mr. Justice Musmanno:
I see no reason whatsoever for sending • this case back for another trial. • The only one who could possibly be hurt by an affirmance of a single verdict is the hus-.1 band, and he has indicated his willingness to assign his share of the verdict, whatever it may be, to his wife. A release can be drawn, with .the approval of the Court, which will forever save the defendants against any further possible claims as a result of this trespass action and will equally bar the plaintiffs from any further action in the entire matter.
Why saddle on to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Siidekum v. Animal Rescue League of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Lewis v. Hunlock's Creek & Muhlenburg Turnpike Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Lehigh Iron Co. v. RuppSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
- Fulcomer v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Taylor v. RoundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.