Legal Opinion

Roeder (ID 65192) v. Schnurr

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided November 20, 2020No. 5:20-cv-03275Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS SCOTT P. ROEDER, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. 20-3275-SAC DAN SCHNURR, Respondent. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is a petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has filed a motion for an extension of time to allow him 60 days, rather than 30 days, to file a traverse. The Court will grant the request. Also before the Court is petitioner’s motion to amend the petition to add the claim that he was subjected to a “pattern of legal indifference for his rights.” Petitioner states that he presented this claim…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API