Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided September 27, 2000No. 04-99-00722-CRPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by: TOM RICKHOFF, Justice.

Pablo Rodriguez was charged with driving while intoxicated, enhanced by two pri- or convictions for driving while intoxicated (DWI). A jury, finding the enhancement paragraphs true, found Rodriguez guilty of the felony offense of DWI. The trial court assessed punishment at 35 years confinement. We address whether: (1) the evidence was factually sufficient to support the conviction and (2) a 1991 DWI conviction was used both for the purpose of enhancing the offense and enhancing the punishment. We hold the evidence was sufficient to support the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Clewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  2. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Lucas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  5. McClendon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Weaver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Hankins v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  4. Ernest Leyba v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  5. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API