Legal Opinion

Malamis v. Stein

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 7, 1986No. 247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT M. BELL, Judge.

This appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court for Allegany County requires us to determine whether a trial judge must award attorney fees and other litigation expenses to the prevailing party in an action brought pursuant to the Maryland “Sunshine Law”, Maryland State Government Code Ann. § 10-501 et seq. Because we find that, by its terms, Maryland State Government Code Ann. § 10-510(e)(5)(i)1 makes such awards discretionary with the trial judge and, that in this case, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to make the award sought, we will affirm.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. I. W. Berman Properties v. Porter Bros.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Bagby v. BealCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. Mayor of Baltimore v. HackelyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  2. Barufaldi v. Ocean CityCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Baltimore County v. Wesley Chapel Bluemount Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API