Legal Opinion
United States v. OM Scott & Sons Company
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 8, 1969No. Civ. A. 760-64PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HART, District Judge.
NATURE OF ACTION
The plaintiff in this action is the United States of America.
The defendant, the The O. M. Scott & .Sons Company, is an Ohio corporation with its principal offices at Marysville, Ohio.
Defendant is one of the largest manufacturers and distributors of lawn care products in the United States.
Plaintiff contends that during the period January 1, 1959, to March 30, 1964, the defendant acted unlawfully to maintain prices in so-called non-fair trade states and in the District of Columbia.
FINDINGS OF FACT
This action was filed March 30, 1964, and complains of alleged…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richard Gray v. Shell Oil Company, Shell Oil Company, Cross-Appellant v. Richard Gray, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Kolling v. Dow Jones & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1982
- Pearl Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1972
- OM Droney Beverage Co. v. Miller Brewing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973