OM Droney Beverage Co. v. Miller Brewing Company
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
This case, based on an alleged breach of contract, presents a classical example of a situation where the remedy at law in the form of an award of damages should plaintiffs prevail is adequate. Therefore a court of equity should not interfere by the attempted use of preliminary or permanent injunctive process.
Plaintiff Droney Beverage Co. (Droney) alleges that as a distributor of Miller Brewing Company (Miller) products in Minneapolis, Minnesota for some 33 years, it was wronged when overnight by telegram on October 5, 1973 it was advised by Miller that it would no…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Fashion Originators' Guild of America, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Perry Mullis, D/B/A Mullis Petroleum Co. v. Arco Petroleum Corporation and Atlantic Richfield CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Laughlin v. Evanston HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Bascom Food Products Corp. v. Reese Finer Foods, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Leibel v. Raynor Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
- Lakefield Telephone Co. v. Northern Telecom Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.