Legal Opinion
CoolSavings. Com., Inc. v. IQ. Commerce Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 10, 1999No. 98 C 7750PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff CoolSavings — a Michigan corporation having its headquarters and principal place of business in Chicago — sued defendant IQ.Commeree Corporation (“IQ”) for infringement of United States Patent No. 5,761,648 (“the ’648 patent”). The ’648 patent claims a data processing system that allows CoolSavings to issue electronic certificates (advertisements and coupons) over interactive online networks, such as the Internet. Customers who enroll on CoolSavings’s web site are presented with a list of offers from advertisers such as retail stores…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Keller v. HendersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Northbrook Digital, LLC v. Vendio Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Steelcase, Inc. v. Smart Technologies, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
- Bell v. Imperial Palace Hotel/Casino, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2001
- Caterpillar, Inc. v. ESCO Corp.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.