Thirion v. Fredrickson & Watson Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
For the reasons hereinafter stated, we cannot believe that a contractor who agrees to reconstruct a highway becomes liable for an injury caused by a preexisting depression on the highway within the area of the project but outside the area where he has worked. On the other hand a jury could infer negligence on the part of the contractor, and proximately caused injury, from the deposit of wet loose gravel on that part of the highway upon which the contractor had not yet undertaken construction. Hence the court properly granted a nonsuit as to the first matter but not as to the second.
Appellant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Barrett v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Bosqui v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Paz v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Smith v. Lockheed Propulsion Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Ray v. Silverado ConstructorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Kaiser Steel Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Cumming v. Nielson's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.