Legal Opinion

Paz v. State of California

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2000No. S068742PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

This case concerns the duty private contractors owe the general public when they undertake work that might affect an allegedly dangerous condition of public property. Consequently, we consider the negligent undertaking theory of liability articulated in Restatement Second of Torts, section 324A (section 324A), and its application in this context.

As we recently stated in Artiglio v. Corning Inc. (1998) 18 Cal.4th 604, 613 [76 Cal.Rptr.2d 479, 957 P.2d 1313] (Artiglio), the section 324A theory of liability—sometimes referred to as the “Good Samaritan” mle—is a settled principle…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Artiglio v. Corning Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Parsons v. Crown Disposal Co.California Supreme Court · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Doe I v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Delgado v. Trax Bar & GrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Klein v. United StatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
  5. In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API