Mott Iron Works v. Metropolitan Bank
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of tbe superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered June 18, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, after a trial on the merits.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
Action to recover the amount of a check drawn to the order of plaintiff, admittedly collected by defendant *656and claimed to have been by it misapplied. The first trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Upon appeal, that judgment was reversed and the cause was remanded for a new trial. The second trial had a like result. Defendant again appeals. The dominant facts, which are in no material particular changed or modified by the evidence on the second trial, are sufficiently stated in the opinion on the first appeal. The statement there, both as to pleadings'and evidence, is by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Perrault v. Emporium Department Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
- Mott Iron Works v. Metropolitan BankWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Hoffman v. WatkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Smith Sand & Gravel Co. v. CorbinWashington Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Buob v. Feenaughty MacHinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Lindstrom v. Seattle Taxicab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
- City of Tacoma v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.