Legal Opinion

Dunham v. Hackney Airpark, Inc.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 23, 1999No. 24898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZMAN, Judge.

Belinda and Roger Dunham, husband and wife, appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Hackney Airpark, Inc. The principal issue presented is whether the plats of the Hackney Field Addition and First Addition to Hackney Field Addition granted unrestricted use of the Hackney Field airstrip and taxiways to purchasers of the adjoining subdivision lots. 1 We affirm the district court’s order.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In September 1975, Clifford and Floriee Hackney’s application for a subdivision of their property surrounding their private…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Edwards v. Conchemco, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Meisner v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cassell v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954
  5. Anderson v. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. West Wood Investments, Inc. v. AcordIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Sun Valley Land & Minerals, Inc. v. HawkesIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Armand v. OPPORTUNITY MANAGEMENT CO., INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ponderosa Home Site Lot Owners v. Garfield Bay Resort, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Ponderosa Homesite Lot Owners v. Garfield Bay Resort, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API