Legal Opinion
Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc., Unique Beverage Dispensers, Inc., David Fox, and Bruce Burwick
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 7, 2002No. 01-1263, 01-1317PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LINN. Dissenting opinion filed by Chief Judge MAYER.
*731LINN, Circuit Judge.
Juicy Whip, Inc. (“Juicy Whip”) appeals from a final judgment of invalidity and unenforceability of its U.S. Patent No. 5,575,405 (“the '405 patent”), entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California on January 18, 2001, in favor of the defendants (collectively, “Orange Bang”). Juicy Whip, Inc. v. Orange Bang, Inc., No. 96-08148 ABC (RNBx) (C.D.Cal. Feb. 21, 2001). We conclude that substantial evidence does not support the jury’s verdict that…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Muniauction, Inc. v. Thomson Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Liquid Dynamics Corp. v. Vaughan Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Alps South, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.