Stiebel v. Lissberger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiffs, Samuel J. Stiebel and others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York oh the 30th day of July, 1914, upon the report of a referee appointed to hear and determine the issues, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 29th day of July, 1914, granting defendant an extra allowance.
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, J.:
This controversy is between a firm of stockbrokers and a customer. Defendant was a speculator in stocks and plaintiffs acted as his brokers for a period of about thirteen months, during which time he had about 100 transactions resulting, according to the accounts kept by plaintiffs, in a considerable loss. Defendant received from plaintiffs the. usual memoranda or slips showing each transaction, and also received at the end of each month an account showing the transactions for the month. These he accepted as veracious accounts of his transactions, and on April 1, 1907, when his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McIntyre v. WhitneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- McIntyre v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Evans v. WrennAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Evans v. . WrennNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Bergen v. HitchingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sands v. Eagle Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- In re SolomonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Johnson v. WinslowNew York Supreme Court · 1935
- Baranowski v. WetzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Cohen v. RothschildAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.