Legal Opinion
Matter of Koenig v. Flynn
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 9, 1932PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
Following the census of 1910, Congress enacted the Thirteenth Apportionment Act, in August of 1911 (Yol. 37, U. S. Statutes at Large, chap. 5, p. 13). It reads in part as follows:
“ That after the third day of March, nineteen hundred and thirteen, the House of Representatives shall be composed of four hundred and thirty-three Members, to be apportioned among the several States as follows: * * * New York, forty-three.
“ Sec. 3. That in each State entitled under this apportionment to more than one Representative, the Representatives to the Sixty-third and each subsequent Congress, shall be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Matter of DoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Hawke v. Smith (No. 1)Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Briscoe v. President of the Bank of the CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smiley v. HolmSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- New York Post Corp. v. LeibowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Koenig v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Town of Amherst v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Matter of Moran v. La GuardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.