Roberts v. Rich
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Chief Justice.
1. A nuisance per se is an act, occupation, or structure which is a nuisance at all times and under any circumstances, regardless of location or surroundings. Simpson v. DuPont Powder Co., 143 Ga. 465, 466 (85 S. E. 344, L. R. A. 1915E, 430); Wilson v. Evans Hotel Co., 188 Ga. 498, 500 (1) (4 S. E. 2d, 155).
2. Mere apprehension of irreparable injury from an alleged nuisance consisting of a house in the course of construction or alteration for a lawful business is not sufficient to authorize an injunction. Code, § 72-204; Richmond Cotton Oil Co. v. Castellaw, 134 Ga. 472…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. KahnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Simpson v. DuPont Powder Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Richmond Cotton Oil Co. v. CastellawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Wilson v. Evans Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Barton v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Strong v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
- Strong v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962