Barton v. Rogers
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
1. The court did not err in disallowing an amendment pleading acts of nuisance subsequently to the filing of the original petition. As amendments relate to the commencement of the suit, facts variant from the circumstances and conditions obtaining at the time suit was filed would be irrelevant and incompetent to establish allegations based upon a theory different from that relied on at the time of the filing of the action, and would add a new and distinct cause of action.
2. According to the definition adopted by this court in Standard Oil Co. v. Kahn, 165 Ga. 575, 576 (141 S. E. 643), “A…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. KahnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Rounsaville v. KohlheimSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Harrison v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
- Hope v. Governor's Horse GuardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
3Cited by15 opinions
- Howden v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Isley v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Griffith v. NewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Thomoson v. SammonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.