Legal Opinion

People v. B.M. (In Re B.M.)

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 20, 2017No. 2d Juv. B277076PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYegan, Acting P.J.

*1294 A common butter knife is designed to cut and spread butter. In the hand of a person bent on assaulting another, it may be a useful tool to inflict great bodily injury. Consistent with an express direction from the California Supreme Court *1295 ( People v. McCoy (1944) 25 Cal.2d 177 , 188-189, 153 P.2d 315 ) and time-honored rules on appeal, we conclude that the trial court's factual finding that the instant butter knife was a deadly weapon must be affirmed on appeal. To the extent that In re Brandon T. (2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 1491 , 120 Cal.Rptr.3d 637 holds to the contrary, we respectfully…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. MauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Koback, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. In re B.M.California Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. KobackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. People v. KobackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API