Legal Opinion
Michigan Carpenters' Council Pension Fund v. Smith & Andrews Construction Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 16, 1988No. Civ. A. 86-71543PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Michigan Carpenters’ Council Pension Fund, Michigan Carpenters’ Council Health and Welfare Fund, and Michigan Carpenters’ Council Apprenticeship and Training Fund, moved for a default judgment against the garnishee defendant, Manufacturers National Bank of Detroit (the Bank).
The action against the principal defendants, Smith & Andrews Construction Company and JMF Associates, arose under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq., under which I have jurisdiction.
Plaintiffs obtained a consent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- George P. Baker, Trustees of the Property of Penn Central Transportation Company v. National City Bank of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Walters v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- First Bank of Whiting v. Samocki Bros. Trucking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Coastal Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. HutchinsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. LundquistSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Whitney National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993
- Wenneker v. Physicians Multispecialty Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Maines Paper & Food Service-Midwest, Inc. v. Regal Foods, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- McKinney, Inc. v. Wyman Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ladd v. Motor City Plastics Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013