Ladd v. Motor City Plastics Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJansen, J.
I fully concur with parts I, II, 111(A), III(B), and III(E) of the majority opinion. I must respectfully dissent, however, with respect to parts III(C) and III(D) of the majority opinion.
MCR 3.101(H) governs the matter of garnishee disclosures. The majority correctly points out that, among other things, MCR 3.101(H)(1)(a) requires a garnishee to “claimG any setoff that the garnishee would have against the defendant. . . .” (Emphasis added). Given the language of this court rule, the majority concludes that making a claim of setoff is not the same as exercising a right of setoff. The majority…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lifewise Master Funding v. TelebankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Walters v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- In Re ArcherUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1983
- United States v. One Silicon Valley Bank Account, 3300355711District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.