Legal Opinion

Indianapolis Telephone Co. v. Sproul

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1910No. 7,119PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action by William E. Sproul against the Indianapolis Telephone Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, J.

Action by appellee. Complaint in one paragraph. Demurrer for want of facts overruled. Answer in general denial. Trial by jury. Verdict for $2,500, with answers to ninety-seven interrogatories. Motions for judgment on such answers and for a new trial were overruled. Judgment on the verdict.

The complaint covers four closely printed pages of appellant's brief. Its substance is that plaintiff was on January 23, 1906, in the employ of defendant as a cableman; that it was his duty, as ordered, to repair breaks in cables of a telephone system owned and operated by defendant in Indianapolis ; that on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Pantzar v. . Tilly Foster Iron Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Benzing v. . Steinway and SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HennesseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Davis v. HostetterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Evansville & Southern Traction Co. v. MontgomeryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Walling v. HauteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Ross v. MayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API