Legal Opinion

Ainsworth v. Vasquez

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 15, 1991No. CIV-S-90-329-LKK-JFM, CIV-S-89-823-EJG-GGHPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEVI, District Judge:

In these two death penalty habeas corpus cases, petitioners seek reconsideration of orders by the magistrate judges setting hearings that have come to be known as “Neuschafer hearings”. 1 At such a hearing the magistrate judge proposes to question the petitioner concerning the existence of any unexhausted habeas corpus claims. The stated primary purpose of the hearing is to attempt to consolidate all claims in one proceeding and to avoid the piecemeal treatment of claims in multiple petitions. Because this procedure will be at issue in many death penalty habeas…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Karis v. VasquezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
  2. Gordon v. VasquezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
  3. Cherrix v. TrueDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API