Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Vasquez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 25, 1994No. Civ. S-91-882 LKK/PANPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Chief Judge Emeritus.
Petitioner, a state prisoner condemned to death, filed pro se a petition for habeas corpus. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Local Rules 302(e)(17), 303, 304, who granted permission to proceed in forma pauperis, stayed the execution, and initiated the process of obtaining counsel for petitioner. See Local Rule 191(d), (h)(2). 1 In due course, counsel were appointed to represent petitioner and, after filing an amended petition, they moved for investigative and expert funds. The magistrate judge could not determine…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. VaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Calderon v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1229, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2776, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1821 Arthur Calderon, Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of California v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Patrick Bruce Gordon, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Ashmus v. CalderonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
- Chambers v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.