In Re Petition of the Town of Normal
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith
One of the ways for a city to annex contiguous land volitionally, so to speak, is to enact an ordinance to that effect. This method is more circumscribed than by the so-called petition route where owners of contiguous land seek to be annexed. The statutory basis for annexation by ordinance is Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 24, par. 7 — 1—2, which reads, so far as we are concerned:
“* # * the corporate authorities of any such municipality may initiate the proceedings by enacting an ordinance expressing their desire to annex such described territory; provided, no tract of land in excess of 10 acres…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Museum Development Corp. v. Wheeling Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
- Illinois Central Railroad v. Village of South PekinIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. IckelheimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- People v. FerrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
- People ex rel. Chicago General Railway Co. v. ChaseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Herrington v. County of PeoriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- In re Petition for Annexation of Certain Property to the Village of PlainfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- In Re Petition of Kildeer to AnnexAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Department of Public Works & Buildings v. KellyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Wiggers v. County of SkagitCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.