Legal Opinion

In Re Petition of the Town of Normal

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 16, 1972No. 11392PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

One of the ways for a city to annex contiguous land volitionally, so to speak, is to enact an ordinance to that effect. This method is more circumscribed than by the so-called petition route where owners of contiguous land seek to be annexed. The statutory basis for annexation by ordinance is Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 24, par. 7 — 1—2, which reads, so far as we are concerned:

“* # * the corporate authorities of any such municipality may initiate the proceedings by enacting an ordinance expressing their desire to annex such described territory; provided, no tract of land in excess of 10 acres…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Museum Development Corp. v. Wheeling Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. Village of South PekinIllinois Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. IckelheimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
  4. People v. FerrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  5. People ex rel. Chicago General Railway Co. v. ChaseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Herrington v. County of PeoriaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  2. In re Petition for Annexation of Certain Property to the Village of PlainfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. In Re Petition of Kildeer to AnnexAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. KellyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Wiggers v. County of SkagitCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API